PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWSMX vs. TWCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWSMX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than TWCGX's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TWSMX has underperformed TWCGX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while TWCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.


TWSMX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.27%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.40%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
8.53%

TWCGX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.95%
YTD
7.11%
6M
5.89%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
16.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWSMX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund
6.19%13.67%10.52%13.10%-14.70%12.23%16.20%20.69%-5.56%15.10%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
7.11%15.28%26.20%43.31%-31.39%27.86%35.23%35.39%-1.27%30.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TWSMX and TWCGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 1996

0.89

The correlation between TWSMX and TWCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWSMX vs. TWCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWSMX
TWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TWCGX
TWCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TWCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWSMXTWCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.47

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

4.88

+4.79

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the TWCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWSMX and TWCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWSMXTWCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.79

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.53

+0.12

Drawdowns

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.90%, smaller than the maximum TWCGX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSMX and TWCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWSMXTWCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-59.60%

+21.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-16.69%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-24.20%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-34.92%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.52%

-34.92%

+9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.85%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-15.29%

+10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

5.02%

-3.43%

Volatility

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) is 2.50%, while American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that TWSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWSMXTWCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

3.92%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

12.01%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

15.79%

-7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

21.59%

-10.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

21.31%

-9.90%

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWSMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TWCGX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWSMX vs. TWCGX - Dividend Comparison

TWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than TWCGX's 16.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
16.00%17.14%5.96%4.81%4.86%9.83%5.33%5.60%14.07%10.28%4.64%6.80%
TWSMX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund
6.42%6.88%5.80%2.08%5.54%10.75%5.09%14.25%12.25%11.03%2.14%7.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWSMX and TWCGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWCGX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to TWSMX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSMX dropped -37.90% vs TWCGX's -59.60%.

TWSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWSMX and TWCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer