TWSMX vs. PUDZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TWSMX (American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund) and PUDZX (PGIM Real Assets Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TWSMX returned 8.59%/yr vs 6.52%/yr for PUDZX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TWSMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PUDZX.

Performance

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWSMX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TWSMX has outperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 8.59%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.52% annualized return.

TWSMX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 15.39%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

PUDZX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 17.43%
• 3Y*: 11.83%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TWSMX American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund	6.03%	13.67%	10.52%	13.10%	-14.70%	12.23%	16.20%	20.69%	-5.56%	15.10%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	10.42%	13.40%	8.61%	3.26%	-2.76%	18.49%	4.84%	16.29%	-9.20%	6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TWSMX and PUDZX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between TWSMX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TWSMX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWSMX

TWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 41
TWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
TWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

PUDZX

PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TWSMX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.27	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.09	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	3.97	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	14.32	-4.86

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWSMX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.90%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSMX and PUDZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TWSMX	PUDZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.90%	-21.53%	-16.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.81%	-4.38%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.22%	-8.20%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-17.98%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.52%	-21.53%	-3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-4.38%	+3.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-5.25%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.21%	+0.40%

Volatility

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.07%. This indicates that TWSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TWSMX	PUDZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	2.07%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.33%	6.18%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.99%	7.68%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.02%	10.50%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.44%	9.70%	+1.74%

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWSMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TWSMX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

TWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, less than PUDZX's 7.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	7.91%	8.93%	6.67%	3.66%	9.10%	13.00%	4.94%	3.40%	2.14%	2.10%	1.39%	1.72%
TWSMX American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund	6.99%	6.88%	5.80%	2.08%	5.54%	10.75%	5.09%	14.25%	12.25%	11.03%	2.14%	7.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TWSMX and PUDZX in my portfolio?

TWSMX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TWSMX or PUDZX?

TWSMX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PUDZX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSMX dropped -37.90% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.