PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWCGX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWCGX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TWCGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 17.09%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


TWCGX

1D
1.14%
1M
8.23%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.01%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
17.09%

SCHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
9.13%15.28%26.20%43.31%-31.39%27.86%35.23%35.39%-1.27%30.06%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.74%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TWCGX and SCHG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.98

The correlation between TWCGX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWCGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWCGX
TWCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TWCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWCGXSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.76

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

2.37

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.70

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.76

5.70

+0.06

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWCGX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWCGXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.76

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.88

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.85

-0.32

Drawdowns

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWCGX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWCGX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWCGXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.60%

-34.59%

-25.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.69%

-16.41%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-23.39%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.92%

-34.59%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

-34.59%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-5.20%

-10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

4.90%

+0.11%

Volatility

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWCGXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.31%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

11.56%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

15.45%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

22.27%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

21.55%

-0.24%

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWCGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWCGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TWCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.70%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
15.70%17.14%5.96%4.81%4.86%9.83%5.33%5.60%14.07%10.28%4.64%6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, TWCGX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TWCGX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWCGX dropped -59.60% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

TWCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWCGX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer