TWSMX vs. BGEIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TWSMX (American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund) and BGEIX (American Century Global Gold Fund) are both mutual funds - TWSMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Century, while BGEIX is a Gold fund managed by American Century. Over the past 10 years, TWSMX returned 8.59%/yr vs 12.88%/yr for BGEIX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TWSMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BGEIX.

Performance

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWSMX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than BGEIX's -3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, TWSMX has underperformed BGEIX with an annualized return of 8.59%, while BGEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.88% annualized return.

TWSMX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 15.39%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

BGEIX

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: -3.68%
• 6M: -7.64%
• 1Y: 59.00%
• 3Y*: 42.03%
• 5Y*: 20.76%
• 10Y*: 12.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TWSMX American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund	6.03%	13.67%	10.52%	13.10%	-14.70%	12.23%	16.20%	20.69%	-5.56%	15.10%
BGEIX American Century Global Gold Fund	-3.68%	158.45%	15.10%	7.52%	-12.54%	-8.85%	18.92%	37.82%	-7.43%	10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TWSMX and BGEIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 1996	0.27

Over the past year, TWSMX and BGEIX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

TWSMX vs. BGEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWSMX

TWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 41
TWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
TWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

BGEIX

BGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
BGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TWSMX	BGEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.28	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.70	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	1.58	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	4.33	+5.13

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the BGEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWSMX and BGEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.90%, smaller than the maximum BGEIX drawdown of -78.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSMX and BGEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TWSMX	BGEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.90%	-78.69%	+40.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.81%	-36.12%	+29.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.22%	-36.12%	+24.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-46.62%	+24.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.52%	-51.92%	+26.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-28.07%	+27.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-35.14%	+29.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	13.13%	-11.52%

Volatility

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) is 3.32%, while American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) has a volatility of 16.29%. This indicates that TWSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TWSMX	BGEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	16.29%	-12.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.33%	37.40%	-30.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.99%	44.44%	-35.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.02%	34.03%	-23.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.44%	33.49%	-22.05%

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWSMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BGEIX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TWSMX vs. BGEIX - Dividend Comparison

TWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than BGEIX's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGEIX American Century Global Gold Fund	1.17%	0.85%	1.36%	1.56%	1.38%	2.13%	0.56%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	10.56%	0.00%
TWSMX American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund	6.99%	6.88%	5.80%	2.08%	5.54%	10.75%	5.09%	14.25%	12.25%	11.03%	2.14%	7.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TWSMX and BGEIX in my portfolio?

TWSMX and BGEIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TWSMX or BGEIX?

BGEIX has higher volatility (16.29%) compared to TWSMX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSMX dropped -37.90% vs BGEIX's -78.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TWSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.