PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWCGX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWCGX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TWCGX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.73%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.


TWCGX

1D
1.47%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.05%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
16.73%

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
4.53%15.28%26.20%43.31%-31.39%27.86%35.23%35.39%-1.27%30.06%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TWCGX and QQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.93

The correlation between TWCGX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWCGX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWCGX
TWCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TWCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWCGXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.44

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

12.79

-8.53

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWCGX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWCGX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWCGX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWCGXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.60%

-82.97%

+23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.69%

-11.96%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-22.77%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.92%

-35.12%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

-35.12%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-0.99%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-32.73%

+17.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

3.21%

+1.91%

Volatility

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) is 6.34%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that TWCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWCGXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

8.47%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

14.20%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

17.67%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

22.64%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

22.43%

-1.05%

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWCGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWCGX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TWCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.39%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.41%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
16.39%17.14%5.96%4.81%4.86%9.83%5.33%5.60%14.07%10.28%4.64%6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TWCGX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to TWCGX (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWCGX dropped -59.60% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWCGX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer