PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWSMX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWSMX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TWSMX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.81% annualized return.


TWSMX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.27%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.40%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
8.53%

QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.25%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
0.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWSMX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund
6.19%13.67%10.52%13.10%-14.70%12.23%16.20%20.69%-5.56%15.10%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.25%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TWSMX and QBDSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.46

Over the past year, TWSMX and QBDSX have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWSMX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWSMX
TWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWSMXQBDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.11

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

0.69

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

1.93

+7.75

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWSMX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWSMXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.60

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.18

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.15

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.16

+0.49

Drawdowns

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.90%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSMX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWSMXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-18.38%

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-3.09%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-3.76%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-7.40%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.52%

-18.38%

-7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-7.83%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-6.85%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.11%

+0.48%

Volatility

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.64%. This indicates that TWSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWSMXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

0.64%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

2.39%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

3.59%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

4.32%

+6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

5.25%

+6.16%

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWSMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWSMX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

TWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than QBDSX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.46%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%
TWSMX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund
6.42%6.88%5.80%2.08%5.54%10.75%5.09%14.25%12.25%11.03%2.14%7.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWSMX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWSMX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to QBDSX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSMX dropped -37.90% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

TWSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWSMX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer