PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBDSX vs. MTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBDSX vs. MTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBDSX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than MTD's -17.04% return. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX has underperformed MTD with an annualized return of 0.74%, while MTD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.


QBDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
0.75%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
0.74%

MTD

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-17.04%
6M
-18.24%
1Y
-0.60%
3Y*
-3.53%
5Y*
-3.12%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBDSX vs. MTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
-0.50%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
-17.04%13.93%0.88%-16.08%-14.83%48.92%43.67%40.26%-8.71%48.01%

Correlation

The correlation between QBDSX and MTD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.26

The correlation between QBDSX and MTD shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBDSX vs. MTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MTD
MTD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBDSX vs. MTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBDSXMTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.03

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-0.02

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

-0.05

+0.87

QBDSX vs. MTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the MTD Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBDSX and MTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBDSX vs. MTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBDSX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum MTD drawdown of -61.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBDSX and MTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBDSXMTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-61.43%

+43.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-31.90%

+28.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-36.61%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.40%

-43.47%

+36.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.38%

-43.47%

+25.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-32.06%

+23.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-13.70%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

12.04%

-10.83%

Volatility

QBDSX vs. MTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) is 0.86%, while Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that QBDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBDSXMTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

8.85%

-7.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

26.22%

-23.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

32.03%

-28.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

32.18%

-27.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

29.76%

-24.50%

Dividends

QBDSX vs. MTD - Dividend Comparison

QBDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while MTD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.50%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBDSX and MTD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTD has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to QBDSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBDSX dropped -18.38% vs MTD's -61.43%.

QBDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBDSX and MTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer