QBDSX vs. MBAIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) and MBAIX (MainStay Balanced Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX returned 0.73%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for MBAIX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBDSX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for MBAIX.

Performance

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBDSX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than MBAIX's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX has underperformed MBAIX with an annualized return of 0.73%, while MBAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.43% annualized return.

QBDSX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: -0.83%
• 1Y: 0.99%
• 3Y*: 2.65%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 0.73%

MBAIX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 4.38%
• 1Y: 13.23%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: 7.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	-0.50%	5.11%	1.02%	2.25%	-4.09%	-0.66%	-9.22%	10.50%	-3.17%	5.05%
MBAIX MainStay Balanced Fund	4.75%	11.38%	7.59%	7.56%	-5.80%	17.13%	7.73%	19.28%	-7.53%	9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between QBDSX and MBAIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.46

Over the past year, QBDSX and MBAIX have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

QBDSX vs. MBAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBDSX

QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 5
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MBAIX

MBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
MBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
MBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBDSX	MBAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.91	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	2.78	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.35	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	2.87	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.93	11.54	-10.61

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the MBAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBDSX and MBAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBDSX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum MBAIX drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBDSX and MBAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBDSX	MBAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-39.74%	+21.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-4.69%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.76%	-8.37%	+4.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.40%	-13.19%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.38%	-25.87%	+7.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.52%	-1.14%	-7.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-3.56%	-3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	1.16%	+0.04%

Volatility

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) is 0.86%, while MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that QBDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBDSX	MBAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	2.12%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	5.25%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	7.05%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.32%	9.41%	-5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	10.61%	-5.35%

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBDSX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MBAIX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBDSX vs. MBAIX - Dividend Comparison

QBDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than MBAIX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBAIX MainStay Balanced Fund	6.65%	6.95%	6.14%	2.27%	1.86%	23.51%	2.24%	6.04%	9.37%	7.05%	2.94%	6.93%
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	4.50%	4.47%	3.98%	4.51%	0.54%	0.71%	0.87%	2.26%	2.04%	2.51%	1.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBDSX and MBAIX in my portfolio?

QBDSX and MBAIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBDSX or MBAIX?

MBAIX has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to QBDSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBDSX dropped -18.38% vs MBAIX's -39.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.