TUSK vs. GIS
TUSK (Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. TUSK operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, TUSK returned -3.15%/yr vs -7.83%/yr for GIS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TUSK vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSK achieves a 77.84% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -23.47% return.
TUSK
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 77.84%
- 6M
- 85.88%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- -10.70%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
GIS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- -23.47%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- -21.38%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- -2.63%
TUSK vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 77.84% | -38.33% | -32.74% | -48.44% | 375.27% | -59.10% | 102.27% | -87.59% | -7.67% | 29.14% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -23.47% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSK and GIS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
TUSK:
$159.01M
GIS:
$18.72B
TUSK:
-$1.47
GIS:
$4.08
TUSK:
2.54
GIS:
1.02
TUSK:
0.60
GIS:
2.00
TUSK:
$62.70M
GIS:
$18.37B
TUSK:
$9.65M
GIS:
$4.70B
TUSK:
-$14.10M
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSK vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
TUSK
GIS
TUSK vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUSK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.77 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.91 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | -1.86 | +2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUSK vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSK drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSK and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.55% | -59.63% | -38.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.52% | -36.85% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.27% | -55.32% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.00% | -59.63% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.77% | -56.70% | -35.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.03% | -10.28% | -62.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.68% | 19.06% | +4.62% |
Volatility
TUSK vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) has a higher volatility of 22.47% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.25%. This indicates that TUSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.47% | 6.25% | +16.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.18% | 18.81% | +36.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.95% | 23.96% | +42.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 21.14% | +51.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.23% | 22.10% | +65.13% |
Dividends
TUSK vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
TUSK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.07% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.36% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TUSK vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TUSK vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
TUSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.78M and revenue of 22.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TUSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
TUSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.19M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSK and GIS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUSK has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to GIS (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSK dropped -98.55% vs GIS's -59.63%.
TUSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUSK and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer