PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSK vs. ASRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TUSK vs. ASRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TUSK

1D
1.89%
1M
-13.74%
6M
12.03%
YTD
45.95%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
-20.53%
5Y*
-4.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.05%

ASRT

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$450.90K$477.96K$1.12M

TUSK vs. ASRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
45.95%-38.33%-32.74%-48.44%375.27%-59.10%102.27%-87.59%-7.67%29.14%
ASRT
Assertio Holdings, Inc.
159.10%-30.59%-18.59%-75.12%97.25%52.40%-71.39%-65.37%-55.16%-55.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSK and ASRT is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TUSK:

$130.06M

ASRT:

$151.20M

EPS

TUSK:

-$1.47

ASRT:

-$5.27

PS Ratio

TUSK:

2.08

ASRT:

1.52

PB Ratio

TUSK:

0.50

ASRT:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

TUSK:

$62.70M

ASRT:

$102.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TUSK:

$9.65M

ASRT:

$71.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

TUSK:

-$14.10M

ASRT:

-$2.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSK vs. ASRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TUSK
TUSK Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TUSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TUSK vs. ASRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSKASRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

TUSK vs. ASRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSK vs. ASRT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSKASRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.00%

Volatility

TUSK vs. ASRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSKASRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.96%

Dividends

TUSK vs. ASRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither TUSK nor ASRT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASRT
Assertio Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.36%1.39%

Financials

TUSK vs. ASRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and Assertio Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSK and ASRT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSK and ASRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer