TTXU vs. ATMP
TTXU (Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - TTXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TTXU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.
Performance
TTXU vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTXU achieves a 50.13% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's 22.14% return.
TTXU
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 55.95%
- YTD
- 50.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- YTD
- 22.14%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
TTXU vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 50.13% | -14.75% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 22.14% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTXU and ATMP is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTXU vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
TTXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ATMP
TTXU vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TTXU) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTXU | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTXU vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTXU drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTXU and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTXU | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -80.86% | +29.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -4.41% | -11.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -30.94% | +8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
TTXU vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTXU | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.88% | 14.50% | +49.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.88% | 22.11% | +41.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.88% | 27.64% | +36.24% |
TTXU vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTXU vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
TTXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTXU and ATMP have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATMP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATMP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TTXU.
TTXU has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
TTXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ATMP is MLPs. TTXU tracks S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TTXU and 0.95% for ATMP.
Find the right allocation for TTXU and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer