TTDU vs. OOQB
Compare and contrast key facts about T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB).
TTDU and OOQB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TTDU is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Sep 16, 2025. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.
Performance
TTDU vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TTDU vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -69.59% | -37.11% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -28.69% | -23.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -69.59% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -28.69% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- -15.13%
- YTD
- -69.59%
- 6M
- -83.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 6M
- -45.98%
- 1Y
- -14.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TTDU vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
OOQB
TTDU vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTDU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.94 | -0.57 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and OOQB is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TTDU vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 13.89% | 9.53% |
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -87.87%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and OOQB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.87% | -53.44% | -34.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.30% | -50.78% | -35.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.95% | -19.94% | -30.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.98% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.52% | 59.59% | +41.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.52% | 61.96% | +39.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.52% | 61.96% | +39.56% |