TTDU vs. TSLT
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. TTDU is actively managed, while TSLT is passively managed. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLT.
Performance
TTDU vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -83.89% return, which is significantly lower than TSLT's -61.81% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -13.40%
- 6M
- -73.54%
- YTD
- -83.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSLT
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -40.70%
- 6M
- -57.20%
- YTD
- -61.81%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.83M | $41.41M | $54.11M | |
| $2.72M | $3.16M | $3.26M |
TTDU vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -83.89% | -36.72% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -61.81% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and TSLT is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLT
TTDU vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTDU | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -93.63%, which is greater than TSLT's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and TSLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.63% | -83.16% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -70.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.74% | -81.45% | -11.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.91% | -51.45% | -13.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.01% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 43.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 70.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.88% | 92.45% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.88% | 117.71% | -12.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.88% | 117.71% | -12.83% |
TTDU vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTDU nor TSLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and TSLT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
TTDU and TSLT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 1.05% for TSLT.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and TSLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer