TTDU vs. MSTU
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.
Performance
TTDU vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -83.89% return, which is significantly lower than MSTU's -78.82% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -13.40%
- 6M
- -73.54%
- YTD
- -83.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MSTU
- 1D
- -8.33%
- 1M
- -18.14%
- 6M
- -76.72%
- YTD
- -78.82%
- 1Y
- -97.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -75.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $207.37M | $183.22M | $204.16M | |
| $2.72M | $3.16M | $3.26M |
TTDU vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -83.89% | -36.72% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -78.82% | -83.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and MSTU is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTU
TTDU vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTDU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -93.63%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and MSTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.63% | -99.43% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -98.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.74% | -99.31% | +6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.91% | -74.11% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 80.95% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 36.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.88% | 148.47% | -43.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.88% | 168.54% | -63.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.88% | 168.54% | -63.66% |
TTDU vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTDU nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and MSTU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
TTDU and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 1.05% for MSTU.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and MSTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer