PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTDU vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -83.89% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 34.44% return.


TTDU

1D
-2.82%
1M
-13.40%
6M
-73.54%
YTD
-83.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BTCZ

1D
5.99%
1M
-6.29%
6M
28.34%
YTD
34.44%
1Y
86.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-51.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$105.31M$113.00M$118.94M
$2.72M$3.16M$3.26M

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TTDU and BTCZ is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTDU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTDU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTDUBTCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -93.63%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDUBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.63%

-91.06%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.74%

-78.32%

-14.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.91%

-73.91%

+9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.54%

Volatility

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDUBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.88%

89.06%

+15.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.88%

95.65%

+9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.88%

95.65%

+9.23%

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTDU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTDU and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.

TTDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTDU and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer