TTDU vs. EMNT
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while EMNT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EMNT.
Performance
TTDU vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -83.24% return, which is significantly lower than EMNT's 1.80% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -38.58%
- YTD
- -83.24%
- 6M
- -82.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMNT
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -83.24% | -36.72% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 1.80% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and EMNT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMNT
TTDU vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTDU | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 4.69 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 32.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 201.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -92.45%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and EMNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.45% | -2.28% | -90.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.45% | -0.02% | -92.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.09% | -0.23% | -60.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.80% | 0.45% | +105.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.80% | 0.83% | +104.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.80% | 0.86% | +104.94% |
TTDU vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison
TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 4.00% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% |
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and EMNT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMNT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMNT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
EMNT has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.
TTDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EMNT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 0.24% for EMNT.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and EMNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer