PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSUMX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSUMX having a 7.24% return and PALDX slightly higher at 7.25%.


TSUMX

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
7.24%
6M
7.61%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

PALDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.80%
YTD
7.25%
6M
6.72%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TSUMX
Thornburg Summit Fund Class I
7.24%20.51%11.42%12.31%-9.79%14.63%27.80%9.43%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.25%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TSUMX and PALDX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2019

0.85

The correlation between TSUMX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSUMX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSUMX
TSUMX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TSUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSUMXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.39

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.38

15.68

-1.30

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSUMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSUMX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSUMX drawdown since its inception was -28.87%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSUMX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSUMXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.87%

-26.16%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-5.96%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.37%

-16.06%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.87%

-20.47%

-8.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-0.59%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-4.07%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.29%

+0.22%

Volatility

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSUMXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.21%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

6.74%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

8.35%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

12.17%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.70%

12.69%

+1.01%

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSUMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSUMX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

TSUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than PALDX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.05%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%
TSUMX
Thornburg Summit Fund Class I
6.46%6.22%4.86%2.03%2.61%19.21%5.11%1.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSUMX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSUMX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to PALDX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSUMX dropped -28.87% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

TSUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSUMX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer