TSUMX vs. LTMFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TSUMX (Thornburg Summit Fund Class I) and LTMFX (Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund) are both mutual funds - TSUMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the MSCI AC World NR USD, while LTMFX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Thornburg. Over the past 5 years, TSUMX returned 9.08%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for LTMFX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSUMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for LTMFX.

Performance

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSUMX achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than LTMFX's 0.74% return.

TSUMX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 6M: 11.87%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: —

LTMFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: 3.78%
• 5Y*: 1.25%
• 10Y*: 1.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TSUMX Thornburg Summit Fund Class I	10.19%	20.51%	11.42%	12.31%	-9.79%	14.63%	27.80%	9.43%
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund	0.74%	5.74%	1.84%	3.83%	-5.27%	-0.18%	2.97%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSUMX and LTMFX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019	0.13

The correlation between TSUMX and LTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TSUMX vs. LTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSUMX

TSUMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
TSUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TSUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
TSUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
TSUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TSUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LTMFX

LTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
LTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSUMX	LTMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.40	2.70	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.79	4.56	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.87	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	2.33	+1.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	7.35	+10.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSUMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is comparable to the LTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSUMX and LTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSUMX	LTMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40	2.70	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.54	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.84	+0.10

Drawdowns

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSUMX drawdown since its inception was -28.87%, which is greater than LTMFX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSUMX and LTMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSUMX	LTMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.87%	-8.40%	-20.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-1.96%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.37%	-2.95%	-7.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.87%	-8.40%	-20.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.88%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-1.64%	-5.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	0.62%	+0.84%

Volatility

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) at 0.63%. This indicates that TSUMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSUMX	LTMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	0.63%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.96%	1.31%	+4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.86%	1.59%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	2.35%	+11.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.71%	2.27%	+11.44%

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSUMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LTMFX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSUMX vs. LTMFX - Dividend Comparison

TSUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than LTMFX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund	3.23%	4.28%	3.60%	2.11%	1.62%	1.27%	1.54%	1.78%	1.83%	1.64%	1.57%	1.56%
TSUMX Thornburg Summit Fund Class I	6.19%	6.22%	4.86%	2.03%	2.61%	19.21%	5.11%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSUMX and LTMFX in my portfolio?

TSUMX and LTMFX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSUMX or LTMFX?

TSUMX has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to LTMFX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSUMX dropped -28.87% vs LTMFX's -8.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.