PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLT vs. AFRU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLT vs. AFRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -21.79% return, which is significantly higher than AFRU's -38.11% return.


TSLT

1D
-0.05%
1M
13.53%
YTD
-21.79%
6M
-22.60%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. AFRU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
-21.79%2.34%
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
-38.11%-42.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and AFRU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLT vs. AFRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. AFRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLTAFRUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

TSLT vs. AFRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLTAFRUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.63

+0.64

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. AFRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum AFRU drawdown of -84.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and AFRU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLTAFRUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-84.44%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.01%

-65.60%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.23%

-56.01%

+5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.07%

Volatility

TSLT vs. AFRU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLTAFRUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.40%

121.30%

-28.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.05%

121.30%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.05%

121.30%

-4.25%

TSLT vs. AFRU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AFRU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLT vs. AFRU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLT nor AFRU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLT and AFRU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

TSLT and AFRU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.50% for AFRU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLT and AFRU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer