TSLT vs. AFRU
TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for AFRU.
Performance
TSLT vs. AFRU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -21.79% return, which is significantly higher than AFRU's -38.11% return.
TSLT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- -21.79%
- 6M
- -22.60%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU
- 1D
- -13.32%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -38.11%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLT vs. AFRU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -21.79% | 2.34% |
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -38.11% | -42.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLT and AFRU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLT vs. AFRU — Risk / Return Rank
TSLT
AFRU
TSLT vs. AFRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLT | AFRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLT | AFRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | -0.63 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
TSLT vs. AFRU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum AFRU drawdown of -84.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and AFRU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLT | AFRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -84.44% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.01% | -65.60% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.23% | -56.01% | +5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.07% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLT vs. AFRU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLT | AFRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.40% | 121.30% | -28.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.05% | 121.30% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.05% | 121.30% | -4.25% |
TSLT vs. AFRU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AFRU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLT vs. AFRU - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLT nor AFRU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLT and AFRU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
TSLT and AFRU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.50% for AFRU.
Find the right allocation for TSLT and AFRU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer