TSLP vs. IWMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLP returned 1.58% vs 35.89% for IWMI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.

Performance

TSLP vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -18.90% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 16.33% return.

TSLP

• 1D: -6.26%
• 1M: -11.44%
• YTD: -18.90%
• 6M: -24.71%
• 1Y: 1.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMI

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 35.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLP vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF	-18.90%	9.77%	75.68%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	16.33%	14.97%	6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLP and IWMI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.52

The correlation between TSLP and IWMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLP vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLP

TSLP Risk / Return Rank: 9
TSLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TSLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TSLP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TSLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TSLP Martin Ratio Rank: 9

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 79
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLP vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLP	IWMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	2.34	-2.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	3.23	-2.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.40	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	4.29	-4.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.11	17.68	-17.57

TSLP vs. IWMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the IWMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLP and IWMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLP vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than IWMI's maximum drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and IWMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLP	IWMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.00%	-23.88%	-22.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.00%	-8.40%	-23.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.09%	-0.73%	-24.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-4.03%	-11.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.90%	2.04%	+11.86%

Volatility

TSLP vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a higher volatility of 15.89% compared to NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) at 5.22%. This indicates that TSLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLP	IWMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.89%	5.22%	+10.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.80%	11.45%	+19.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.02%	15.41%	+26.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.85%	17.95%	+30.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.85%	17.95%	+30.90%

TSLP vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLP vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison

TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.21%, more than IWMI's 14.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.53%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF	31.21%	31.05%	21.82%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLP and IWMI in my portfolio?

TSLP and IWMI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLP or IWMI?

TSLP has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to IWMI (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs IWMI's -23.88%.

Which ETF is better, TSLP or IWMI?

On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 35.89% vs 1.58% for TSLP. On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IWMI has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLP or IWMI?

Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 35.89% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLP or IWMI?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLP or IWMI?

TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 31.21%, compared with 14.53% for IWMI.

What is the main difference between TSLP and IWMI?

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 0.68% for IWMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.