PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLP vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLP vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -18.90% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 2.41% return.


TSLP

1D
-6.26%
1M
-11.44%
YTD
-18.90%
6M
-24.71%
1Y
1.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDL

1D
-8.23%
1M
-15.60%
YTD
2.41%
6M
-0.74%
1Y
52.74%
3Y*
92.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLP vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
-18.90%9.77%41.53%18.37%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
2.41%32.57%344.58%33.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLP and NVDL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLP vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLP
TSLP Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TSLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLP Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLP vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLPNVDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.17

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.25

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

2.75

-2.64

TSLP vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLP and NVDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLP vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLPNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-67.55%

+21.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.00%

-42.23%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.09%

-30.16%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-17.07%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.90%

19.22%

-5.32%

Volatility

TSLP vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) is 15.89%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 26.32%. This indicates that TSLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLPNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.89%

26.32%

-10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.80%

53.60%

-22.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.02%

70.66%

-28.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.85%

90.42%

-41.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.85%

90.42%

-41.57%

TSLP vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLP vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.21%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
31.21%31.05%21.82%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLP and NVDL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDL has higher volatility (26.32%) compared to TSLP (15.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs NVDL's -67.55%.

On 1-year performance, NVDL leads with 52.74% vs 1.58% for TSLP. On fees, TSLP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLP has been the lower-risk option at 15.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 52.74% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDL.

TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 31.21%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.

TSLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 1.05% for NVDL.

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLP and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer