TSCM vs. GUSH
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while GUSH is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). TSCM is actively managed, while GUSH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
TSCM vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 73.56% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- 73.56%
- 6M
- 49.07%
- 1Y
- 75.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- -36.44%
TSCM vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.31% | -0.86% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 73.56% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and GUSH is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
GUSH
TSCM vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCM | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | -0.44 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -99.98% | +85.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -99.79% | +98.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -92.92% | +86.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.52% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 55.62% | -34.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 68.21% | -47.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 93.72% | -72.69% |
TSCM vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.44% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and GUSH have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSCM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GUSH is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 1.17% for GUSH.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer