TSCM vs. EINC
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by TimesSquare, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. TSCM is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EINC.
Performance
TSCM vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 28.58% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- YTD
- 28.58%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.39%
- 5Y*
- 22.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.20M | $2.80M | $2.21M | |
| $26.58K | $29.10K | $32.07K |
TSCM vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 1.88% | -1.32% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 28.58% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and EINC is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
TSCM vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -87.55% | +72.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -2.52% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -43.84% | +38.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 15.42% | +5.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 19.49% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 25.33% | -4.30% |
TSCM vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 2.47% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and EINC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Quality Factor, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.46% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer