TSCM vs. EINC
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. TSCM is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
TSCM vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.74% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
TSCM vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.31% | -0.86% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.74% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and EINC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
EINC
TSCM vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.04 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -87.55% | +72.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -5.44% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -44.29% | +37.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 14.72% | +6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 19.58% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 25.43% | -4.40% |
TSCM vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and EINC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer