TSCM vs. IMF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and IMF (Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while IMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IMF.

Performance

TSCM vs. IMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than IMF's 11.90% return.

TSCM

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: 1.99%
• 6M: 2.32%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 7.89%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCM vs. IMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	4.28%	-1.32%
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	11.90%	0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCM and IMF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

TSCM vs. IMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMF

IMF Risk / Return Rank: 76
IMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IMF Omega Ratio Rank: 75
IMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IMF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCM vs. IMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSCM	IMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.67	—

Drawdowns

TSCM vs. IMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, roughly equal to the maximum IMF drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and IMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCM	IMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-15.29%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.51%	-2.71%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-8.11%	+2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSCM	IMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.90%	10.59%	+10.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.90%	12.34%	+8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.90%	12.34%	+8.56%

TSCM vs. IMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IMF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCM vs. IMF - Dividend Comparison

TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.90%	1.01%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCM and IMF in my portfolio?

TSCM and IMF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSCM or IMF?

On fees, TSCM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSCM or IMF?

TSCM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSCM or IMF?

IMF has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.

What is the main difference between TSCM and IMF?

TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.65% for IMF.