TSCM vs. IMF
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and IMF (Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while IMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IMF.
Performance
TSCM vs. IMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than IMF's 14.07% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 18.34%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCM vs. IMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.31% | -0.86% |
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 14.07% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and IMF is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. IMF — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
IMF
TSCM vs. IMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCM | IMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.33 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. IMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, roughly equal to the maximum IMF drawdown of -15.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and IMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | IMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -15.10% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.83% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -8.41% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.36% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. IMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | IMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 10.45% | +10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 12.48% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 12.48% | +8.55% |
TSCM vs. IMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IMF's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. IMF - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and IMF have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSCM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IMF.
IMF has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.65% for IMF.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and IMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer