TRUT vs. FLTR
TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. TRUT is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
TRUT vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 2.19% return.
TRUT
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
TRUT vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 16.13% | 9.76% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUT and FLTR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUT vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
TRUT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLTR
TRUT vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUT | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 16.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 98.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUT vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUT | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -17.84% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -0.00% | -8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -0.67% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
TRUT vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUT | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.21% | 0.80% | +22.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 2.13% | +21.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 5.00% | +18.21% |
TRUT vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRUT vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.20% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUT and FLTR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.
TRUT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.14% for FLTR.
Find the right allocation for TRUT and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer