PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRUT vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRUT vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's 17.93% return.


TRUT

1D
-0.38%
1M
2.08%
YTD
20.12%
6M
19.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HACK

1D
-1.27%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
17.93%
6M
15.15%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
15.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUT vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
20.12%9.76%
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
17.93%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and HACK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRUT vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUT vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRUTHACKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

TRUT vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and HACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUTHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.55%

-42.68%

+24.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-10.05%

+4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-11.62%

+6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.78%

Volatility

TRUT vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUTHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.95%

26.09%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

24.29%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

23.32%

-0.37%

TRUT vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRUT vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
0.20%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRUT and HACK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.60% for HACK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUT and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer