TRUD vs. FDIS
TRUD (VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. TRUD is actively managed, while FDIS is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TRUD charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
TRUD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRUD achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -0.65% return.
TRUD
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
TRUD vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRUD VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF | -0.40% | 6.73% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.65% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUD and FDIS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.97 |
TRUD vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRUD
FDIS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TRUD
FDIS
Consumer Cyclical
TRUD
FDIS
Communication Services
TRUD
FDIS
Technology
TRUD
FDIS
Industrials
TRUD
FDIS
Basic Materials
TRUD
-
FDIS
-
Consumer Defensive
TRUD
-
FDIS
Energy
TRUD
-
FDIS
-
Healthcare
TRUD
-
FDIS
Real Estate
TRUD
-
FDIS
Utilities
TRUD
-
FDIS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUD vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
TRUD
FDIS
TRUD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRUD | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.61 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TRUD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUD drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum FDIS drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUD and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUD | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -39.16% | +23.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -5.22% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -7.50% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.93% | — |
Volatility
TRUD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUD | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 18.37% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 23.87% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 22.29% | -1.67% |
TRUD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRUD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
TRUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FDIS's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
TRUD VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF | 0.34% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TRUD and FDIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TRUD.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.34% for TRUD.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TRUD and 0.08% for FDIS.
Find the right allocation for TRUD and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer