PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRUD vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRUD vs. MOAT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

TRUD (VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. TRUD is actively managed, while MOAT is passively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TRUD charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

TRUD vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUD achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's 4.36% return.

TRUD

1D
6.17%
1M
0.84%
6M
-1.50%
YTD
0.20%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

MOAT

1D
0.23%
1M
1.68%
6M
3.18%
YTD
4.36%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
13.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

MOAT

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
$65.74M$67.48M$82.03M

TRUD

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF
$4.45M$2.54M$1.74M

TRUD vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		0.20%6.58%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		4.36%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUD and MOAT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.62

TRUD vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRUD
MOAT

Financial Services

61.9%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

37.9%
11.1%

Communication Services

0.1%
2.4%

Technology

0.1%
30.8%

Industrials

0.0%
9.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

18.2%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

18.1%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TRUD
61.9%
MOAT
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TRUD
37.9%
MOAT
11.1%

Communication Services

TRUD
0.1%
MOAT
2.4%

Technology

TRUD
0.1%
MOAT
30.8%

Industrials

TRUD
0.0%
MOAT
9.5%

Basic Materials

TRUD

-

MOAT

-

Consumer Defensive

TRUD

-

MOAT
18.2%

Energy

TRUD

-

MOAT

-

Healthcare

TRUD

-

MOAT
18.1%

Real Estate

TRUD

-

MOAT
0.7%

Utilities

TRUD

-

MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Often compared with TRUD:
TRUD vs. GXPDTRUD vs. TMHTRUD vs. IYCTRUD vs. XLYTRUD vs. RKNGTRUD vs. DVXYTRUD vs. ISHP
Often compared with MOAT:
MOAT vs. SPYMOAT vs. VOOMOAT vs. SCHDMOAT vs. BRK-AMOAT vs. IVVMOAT vs. VTIMOAT vs. IOO

Return for Risk

TRUD vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
TRUD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRUD vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TRUDMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

0.95

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.44

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.16

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

1.06

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

3.17

—

TRUD vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUD vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUD drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUD and MOAT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRUDMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-33.31%

+17.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-12.43%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-21.44%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-23.96%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.31%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-0.06%

-4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-3.82%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

4.16%

—

Volatility

TRUD vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRUDMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.00%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

10.47%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.23%

14.04%

+8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.23%

18.29%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

18.62%

+3.61%

TRUD vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUD vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

TRUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than MOAT's 1.30% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		1.30%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		0.48%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TRUD and MOAT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.48% for TRUD.

TRUD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TRUD and 0.47% for MOAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUD and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer