PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRND vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRND vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return.


TRND

1D
0.09%
1M
4.42%
YTD
10.26%
6M
10.38%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-1.10%
1M
11.94%
YTD
30.30%
6M
29.99%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
34.34%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRND vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
10.26%6.03%11.97%16.48%-15.37%12.95%4.73%7.79%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.30%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and MTUM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.78

The correlation between TRND and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRND vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TRND
MTUM

Technology

30.6%
44.4%

Industrials

13.4%
15.6%

Financial Services

13.2%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
3.6%

Communication Services

7.7%
7.4%

Healthcare

7.4%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.3%

Energy

3.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Utilities

2.3%
1.6%

Technology

TRND
30.6%
MTUM
44.4%

Industrials

TRND
13.4%
MTUM
15.6%

Financial Services

TRND
13.2%
MTUM
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TRND
10.0%
MTUM
3.6%

Communication Services

TRND
7.7%
MTUM
7.4%

Healthcare

TRND
7.4%
MTUM
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

TRND
5.5%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

TRND
3.8%
MTUM
3.5%

Basic Materials

TRND
3.4%
MTUM
1.7%

Real Estate

TRND
2.7%
MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

TRND
2.3%
MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRND vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND
TRND Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRNDMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.53

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

14.10

-2.78

TRND vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRNDMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.14

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.73

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.84

-0.19

Drawdowns

TRND vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRNDMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-34.08%

+16.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-11.54%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.56%

-20.99%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-32.28%

+16.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.10%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-6.21%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.89%

-0.99%

Volatility

TRND vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) is 3.48%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that TRND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRNDMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

7.67%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

16.51%

-7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

19.08%

-7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

20.60%

-10.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.18%

21.03%

-9.85%

TRND vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRND vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
2.10%2.32%2.31%2.51%1.76%0.93%0.60%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRND and MTUM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to TRND (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 14.96% vs 6.27% for TRND. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TRND has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

TRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRND and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer