TRND vs. BDGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).

TRND and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRND is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index. It was launched on May 3, 2019. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.

Performance

TRND vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRND vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	-1.81%	6.03%	11.97%	9.66%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-1.41%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.

TRND

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRND vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

BDGS

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

TRND

Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF

Return for Risk

TRND vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND

TRND Risk / Return Rank: 26
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRND	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	0.99	-0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	1.67	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.28	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	1.80	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.03	9.34	-7.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRND vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRND	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	0.99	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.51	-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and BDGS is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TRND vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	2.36%	2.32%	2.31%	2.51%	1.76%	0.93%	0.60%	0.93%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.56%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TRND vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRND	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-9.12%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-5.85%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-2.15%	-4.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.32%	-0.67%	-4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	1.13%	+1.35%

Volatility

TRND vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that TRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRND	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	3.39%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.73%	5.09%	+3.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.80%	10.70%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.53%	8.35%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.13%	8.35%	+2.78%