TRMK vs. RF
TRMK (Trustmark Corporation) and RF (Regions Financial Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, TRMK returned 9.53%/yr vs 17.63%/yr for RF. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
TRMK vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMK achieves a 23.21% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 16.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMK has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 9.53%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.63% annualized return.
TRMK
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.35%
RF
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 17.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $297.55M | $312.28M | $316.23M | |
| $26.79M | $22.09M | $20.08M |
TRMK vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMK Trustmark Corporation | 23.21% | 12.99% | 30.65% | -17.02% | 10.67% | 22.34% | -17.98% | 24.73% | -8.24% | -8.04% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 16.41% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMK and RF is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1992 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, TRMK and RF have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TRMK:
$2.78B
RF:
$26.41B
TRMK:
$3.93
RF:
$2.55
TRMK:
12.08
RF:
12.13
TRMK:
2.48
RF:
2.83
TRMK:
1.30
RF:
1.52
TRMK:
$1.14B
RF:
$9.57B
TRMK:
$422.89M
RF:
$7.35B
TRMK:
$260.89M
RF:
$2.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRMK vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
TRMK
RF
TRMK vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRMK | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.47 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 3.51 | +4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRMK vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMK drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMK and RF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMK | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -92.65% | +39.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -18.45% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -32.35% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.77% | -40.99% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.77% | -60.73% | +12.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -4.48% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -30.96% | +18.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 7.74% | -3.85% |
Volatility
TRMK vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is 5.31%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that TRMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRMK | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 6.85% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 17.66% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 24.26% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.98% | 31.12% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 35.64% | -5.13% |
Dividends
TRMK vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
TRMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than RF's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.42% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
TRMK Trustmark Corporation | 2.07% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 3.30% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 3.37% | 2.67% | 3.24% | 2.89% | 2.58% | 3.99% |
Financials
TRMK vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trustmark Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRMK and RF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RF has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to TRMK (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMK dropped -53.55% vs RF's -92.65%.
TRMK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRMK and RF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer