RF vs. BANF
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RF or BANF.
Correlation
The correlation between RF and BANF is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RF vs. BANF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RF:
0.31
BANF:
0.92
RF:
0.66
BANF:
1.60
RF:
1.09
BANF:
1.19
RF:
0.30
BANF:
1.10
RF:
0.86
BANF:
3.78
RF:
11.00%
BANF:
7.97%
RF:
30.15%
BANF:
32.76%
RF:
-92.65%
BANF:
-59.39%
RF:
-24.70%
BANF:
-7.63%
Fundamentals
RF:
$18.23B
BANF:
$3.93B
RF:
$2.07
BANF:
$6.61
RF:
9.80
BANF:
17.87
RF:
2.62
BANF:
2.08
RF:
2.74
BANF:
6.15
RF:
1.08
BANF:
2.37
RF:
$5.88B
BANF:
$571.25M
RF:
$6.48B
BANF:
$502.77M
RF:
$1.99B
BANF:
$149.83M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -12.86% return, which is significantly lower than BANF's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has underperformed BANF with an annualized return of 11.52%, while BANF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.
RF
-12.86%
-8.81%
-11.98%
7.98%
20.55%
11.52%
BANF
1.23%
6.03%
11.02%
34.57%
29.72%
17.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RF vs. BANF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RF
BANF
RF vs. BANF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RF vs. BANF - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than BANF's 1.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.88% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
BANF BancFirst Corporation | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.25% | 1.99% | 2.04% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 2.39% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. BANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than BANF's maximum drawdown of -59.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and BANF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RF vs. BANF - Volatility Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a higher volatility of 17.84% compared to BancFirst Corporation (BANF) at 12.98%. This indicates that RF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RF vs. BANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and BancFirst Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities