RF vs. BANF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF).

Performance

RF vs. BANF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RF vs. BANF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RF Regions Financial Corporation	-2.69%	21.99%	27.00%	-5.69%	2.33%	39.39%	-1.61%	33.35%	-20.59%	22.95%
BANF BancFirst Corporation	2.81%	-8.04%	22.62%	12.44%	27.10%	22.79%	-2.90%	27.93%	-0.62%	11.72%

Fundamentals

EPS RF : $2.42 BANF : $7.02
PE Ratio RF : 10.80 BANF : 15.45
PS Ratio RF : 2.42 BANF : 4.19
Total Revenue (TTM) RF : $9.61B BANF : $876.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) RF : $7.17B BANF : $666.77M
EBITDA (TTM) RF : $2.81B BANF : $318.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than BANF's 2.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RF having a 17.02% annualized return and BANF not far behind at 16.50%.

RF

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 17.02%

BANF

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: -13.41%
• 1Y: 0.41%
• 3Y*: 11.24%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: 16.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RF vs. BANF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RF

RF Risk / Return Rank: 69
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BANF

BANF Risk / Return Rank: 40
BANF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BANF Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BANF Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BANF Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BANF Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RF vs. BANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RF	BANF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.01	+0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	0.22	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.03	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	0.05	+1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	0.09	+3.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RF vs. BANF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RF Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the BANF Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF and BANF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RF	BANF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	0.01	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.36	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.46	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.41	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between RF and BANF is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RF vs. BANF - Dividend Comparison

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than BANF's 1.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RF Regions Financial Corporation	4.00%	5.12%	4.17%	4.54%	3.43%	2.98%	3.85%	3.44%	3.44%	1.82%	1.78%	2.40%
BANF BancFirst Corporation	1.78%	1.79%	1.52%	1.71%	1.72%	1.98%	2.25%	1.99%	2.04%	1.56%	1.59%	2.39%

Drawdowns

RF vs. BANF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than BANF's maximum drawdown of -57.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and BANF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RF	BANF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.65%	-57.10%	-35.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.45%	-23.63%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.99%	-37.97%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.73%	-57.10%	-3.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.79%	-19.47%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.19%	-13.94%	-17.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.31%	12.94%	-5.63%

Volatility

RF vs. BANF - Volatility Comparison

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to BancFirst Corporation (BANF) at 6.03%. This indicates that RF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RF	BANF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	6.03%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	20.68%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.81%	29.12%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.63%	30.41%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.02%	35.74%	+0.28%

Financials

RF vs. BANF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regions Financial Corporation and BancFirst Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

BANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported a gross profit of 171.26M and revenue of 175.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.6%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

BANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported an operating income of 78.97M and revenue of 175.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.0%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.

BANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported a net income of 62.65M and revenue of 175.48M, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.