TRMK vs. DXCM
TRMK (Trustmark Corporation) and DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) are both stocks. TRMK operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while DXCM operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TRMK returned 9.53%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for DXCM. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRMK vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMK achieves a 23.21% return, which is significantly lower than DXCM's 25.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMK has underperformed DXCM with an annualized return of 9.53%, while DXCM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.
TRMK
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.35%
DXCM
- 1D
- 11.95%
- 1M
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- -11.89%
- 5Y*
- -8.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | $381.17M | $359.84M | $403.63M |
| $26.79M | $22.09M | $20.08M |
TRMK vs. DXCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMK Trustmark Corporation | 23.21% | 12.99% | 30.65% | -17.02% | 10.67% | 22.34% | -17.98% | 24.73% | -8.24% | -8.04% |
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 25.73% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMK and DXCM is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2005 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
TRMK:
$2.78B
DXCM:
$32.20B
TRMK:
$3.93
DXCM:
$2.51
TRMK:
12.08
DXCM:
33.22
TRMK:
0.41
DXCM:
0.79
TRMK:
2.48
DXCM:
6.68
TRMK:
1.30
DXCM:
12.47
TRMK:
$1.14B
DXCM:
$4.97B
TRMK:
$422.89M
DXCM:
$3.12B
TRMK:
$260.89M
DXCM:
$1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRMK vs. DXCM — Risk / Return Rank
TRMK
DXCM
TRMK vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRMK | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.05 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 0.10 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 0.19 | +7.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRMK vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMK drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum DXCM drawdown of -94.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMK and DXCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMK | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -94.61% | +41.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -33.33% | +22.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -60.95% | +34.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.77% | -66.32% | +18.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.77% | -66.32% | +18.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -48.75% | +48.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -36.14% | +23.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 17.53% | -13.64% |
Volatility
TRMK vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is 5.31%, while DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that TRMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRMK | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 15.95% | -10.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 29.74% | -15.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 42.91% | -19.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.98% | 47.22% | -18.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 48.66% | -18.15% |
Dividends
TRMK vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison
TRMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRMK Trustmark Corporation | 2.07% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 3.30% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 3.37% | 2.67% | 3.24% | 2.89% | 2.58% | 3.99% |
Financials
TRMK vs. DXCM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trustmark Corporation and DexCom, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRMK and DXCM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to TRMK (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMK dropped -53.55% vs DXCM's -94.61%.
TRMK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRMK and DXCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer