TRMK vs. DXCM
TRMK (Trustmark Corporation) and DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) are both stocks. TRMK operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while DXCM operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TRMK returned 9.86%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for DXCM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRMK vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMK achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly higher than DXCM's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMK has underperformed DXCM with an annualized return of 9.86%, while DXCM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.
TRMK
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 31.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
DXCM
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- -13.68%
- 3Y*
- -18.38%
- 5Y*
- -8.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
TRMK vs. DXCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMK Trustmark Corporation | 18.51% | 12.99% | 30.65% | -17.02% | 10.67% | 22.34% | -17.98% | 24.73% | -8.24% | -8.04% |
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 3.84% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMK and DXCM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2005 | 0.25 |
The correlation between TRMK and DXCM shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRMK:
$2.70B
DXCM:
$27.13B
TRMK:
$3.77
DXCM:
$2.31
TRMK:
12.11
DXCM:
29.78
TRMK:
0.41
DXCM:
0.71
TRMK:
2.30
DXCM:
5.75
TRMK:
1.27
DXCM:
9.17
TRMK:
$1.19B
DXCM:
$4.82B
TRMK:
$791.58M
DXCM:
$2.96B
TRMK:
$320.24M
DXCM:
$1.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRMK vs. DXCM — Risk / Return Rank
TRMK
DXCM
TRMK vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRMK | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.97 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | -0.35 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | -0.60 | +9.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRMK vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMK drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum DXCM drawdown of -94.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMK and DXCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMK | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -94.61% | +41.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -38.75% | +28.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -60.95% | +34.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.77% | -66.32% | +18.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.77% | -66.32% | +18.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -57.67% | +57.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -36.04% | +23.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 22.98% | -19.03% |
Volatility
TRMK vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is 5.97%, while DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that TRMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRMK | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 10.85% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.64% | 25.88% | -10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.35% | 41.10% | -17.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 47.06% | -17.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.56% | 48.45% | -17.89% |
Dividends
TRMK vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison
TRMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRMK Trustmark Corporation | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 3.30% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 3.37% | 2.67% | 3.24% | 2.89% | 2.58% | 3.99% |
Financials
TRMK vs. DXCM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trustmark Corporation and DexCom, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRMK vs. DXCM - Profitability Comparison
TRMK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trustmark Corporation reported a gross profit of 202.96M and revenue of 277.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.2%.
DXCM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 750.30M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
TRMK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trustmark Corporation reported an operating income of 70.98M and revenue of 277.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.6%.
DXCM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 255.30M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.
TRMK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trustmark Corporation reported a net income of 56.12M and revenue of 277.21M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
DXCM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 199.50M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRMK and DXCM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to TRMK (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMK dropped -53.55% vs DXCM's -94.61%.
TRMK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRMK and DXCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer