RF vs. CFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RF or CFG.
Correlation
The correlation between RF and CFG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RF vs. CFG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RF:
1.61
CFG:
1.88
RF:
2.39
CFG:
2.84
RF:
1.30
CFG:
1.35
RF:
1.86
CFG:
1.39
RF:
6.19
CFG:
11.35
RF:
6.64%
CFG:
4.91%
RF:
25.68%
CFG:
29.64%
RF:
-92.65%
CFG:
-65.60%
RF:
-9.40%
CFG:
-3.75%
Fundamentals
RF:
$22.41B
CFG:
$20.46B
RF:
$1.93
CFG:
$3.03
RF:
12.78
CFG:
15.45
RF:
4.71
CFG:
0.26
RF:
$6.37B
CFG:
$8.84B
RF:
$6.96B
CFG:
$8.84B
RF:
$1.88B
CFG:
$2.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than CFG's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed CFG with an annualized return of 13.65%, while CFG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.
RF
4.85%
1.90%
15.21%
39.67%
12.89%
13.65%
CFG
7.88%
-0.69%
15.71%
54.43%
8.78%
10.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RF vs. CFG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RF
CFG
RF vs. CFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RF vs. CFG - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than CFG's 3.59% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.97% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 3.59% | 3.84% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 3.30% | 4.36% | 3.35% | 3.30% | 1.52% | 1.29% | 1.53% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. CFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than CFG's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and CFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RF vs. CFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 5.64%, while Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RF vs. CFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities