RF vs. CFG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG).

Performance

RF vs. CFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RF vs. CFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RF Regions Financial Corporation	-2.69%	21.99%	27.00%	-5.69%	2.33%	39.39%	-1.61%	33.35%	-20.59%	22.95%
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc.	3.39%	38.60%	38.01%	-11.01%	-13.37%	37.02%	-6.73%	41.84%	-27.44%	19.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RF : $22.99B CFG : $26.12B
EPS RF : $2.42 CFG : $4.20
PE Ratio RF : 10.80 CFG : 14.27
PS Ratio RF : 2.42 CFG : 2.34
PB Ratio RF : 1.30 CFG : 1.08
Total Revenue (TTM) RF : $9.61B CFG : $11.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) RF : $7.17B CFG : $7.78B
EBITDA (TTM) RF : $2.81B CFG : $2.69B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than CFG's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed CFG with an annualized return of 17.02%, while CFG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.08% annualized return.

RF

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 17.02%

CFG

• 1D: 4.39%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 51.73%
• 3Y*: 31.22%
• 5Y*: 10.47%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RF vs. CFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RF

RF Risk / Return Rank: 69
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CFG

CFG Risk / Return Rank: 84
CFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CFG Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CFG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RF vs. CFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RF	CFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.59	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.03	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.31	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	2.97	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	8.29	-4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RF vs. CFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RF Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the CFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF and CFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RF	CFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.59	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.31	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.40	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.34	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between RF and CFG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RF vs. CFG - Dividend Comparison

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than CFG's 2.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RF Regions Financial Corporation	4.00%	5.12%	4.17%	4.54%	3.43%	2.98%	3.85%	3.44%	3.44%	1.82%	1.78%	2.40%
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc.	2.93%	2.94%	3.84%	5.07%	4.11%	3.30%	4.36%	3.35%	3.30%	1.52%	1.29%	1.53%

Drawdowns

RF vs. CFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than CFG's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and CFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RF	CFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.65%	-65.60%	-27.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.45%	-18.32%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.99%	-56.19%	+15.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.73%	-65.60%	+4.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.79%	-11.96%	-2.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.19%	-18.12%	-13.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.31%	6.57%	+0.74%

Volatility

RF vs. CFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 6.68%, while Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RF	CFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	8.03%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	20.85%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.81%	32.80%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.63%	34.14%	-2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.02%	38.28%	-2.26%

Financials

RF vs. CFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regions Financial Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

CFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

CFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 677.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.

CFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 528.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.