PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RF vs. CFG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RF and CFG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

RF vs. CFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
25.67%
24.85%
RF
CFG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RF:

1.03

CFG:

1.04

Sortino Ratio

RF:

1.63

CFG:

1.69

Omega Ratio

RF:

1.20

CFG:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

RF:

1.15

CFG:

0.81

Martin Ratio

RF:

5.10

CFG:

6.33

Ulcer Index

RF:

5.38%

CFG:

5.09%

Daily Std Dev

RF:

26.53%

CFG:

31.10%

Max Drawdown

RF:

-92.65%

CFG:

-65.60%

Current Drawdown

RF:

-14.43%

CFG:

-13.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RF:

$22.37B

CFG:

$19.72B

EPS

RF:

$1.77

CFG:

$2.55

PE Ratio

RF:

13.90

CFG:

17.55

PEG Ratio

RF:

4.61

CFG:

0.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

RF:

$7.51B

CFG:

$10.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RF:

$8.09B

CFG:

$10.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

RF:

$2.76B

CFG:

$939.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 25.79% return, which is significantly lower than CFG's 33.88% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed CFG with an annualized return of 12.11%, while CFG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.


RF

YTD

25.79%

1M

-10.73%

6M

25.20%

1Y

25.92%

5Y*

10.65%

10Y*

12.11%

CFG

YTD

33.88%

1M

-7.82%

6M

24.85%

1Y

37.02%

5Y*

5.74%

10Y*

9.15%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RF vs. CFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RF, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.981.04
The chart of Sortino ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.561.69
The chart of Omega ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.191.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.090.81
The chart of Martin ratio for RF, currently valued at 4.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.004.756.33
RF
CFG

The current RF Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the CFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF and CFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.98
1.04
RF
CFG

Dividends

RF vs. CFG - Dividend Comparison

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than CFG's 3.96% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.21%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
3.96%5.07%4.11%3.30%4.36%3.35%3.30%1.52%1.29%1.53%0.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

RF vs. CFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than CFG's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and CFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-14.43%
-13.45%
RF
CFG

Volatility

RF vs. CFG - Volatility Comparison

Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) have volatilities of 7.28% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.28%
7.06%
RF
CFG

Financials

RF vs. CFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab