RF vs. CFG

In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 40.53% return, which is significantly lower than CFG's 45.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed CFG with an annualized return of 13.87%, while CFG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RF Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the CFG Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF and CFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than CFG's 3.65% yield.

The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than CFG's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and CFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 12.20%, while Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.