RF vs. CMA
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RF or CMA.
Correlation
The correlation between RF and CMA is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RF vs. CMA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RF:
1.17
CMA:
0.59
RF:
1.81
CMA:
1.03
RF:
1.23
CMA:
1.13
RF:
1.31
CMA:
0.40
RF:
5.65
CMA:
2.62
RF:
5.52%
CMA:
7.51%
RF:
26.55%
CMA:
33.47%
RF:
-92.65%
CMA:
-78.35%
RF:
-12.67%
CMA:
-29.78%
Fundamentals
RF:
$22.37B
CMA:
$8.47B
RF:
$1.77
CMA:
$4.00
RF:
13.90
CMA:
16.10
RF:
4.61
CMA:
0.32
RF:
$7.51B
CMA:
$4.76B
RF:
$8.09B
CMA:
$4.52B
RF:
$2.76B
CMA:
$213.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 28.38% return, which is significantly higher than CMA's 15.44% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed CMA with an annualized return of 12.11%, while CMA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.
RF
28.38%
-8.64%
28.12%
29.99%
11.09%
12.11%
CMA
15.44%
-8.93%
30.97%
16.99%
1.88%
6.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RF vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RF vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than CMA's 4.64% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.12% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 1.01% |
CMA Comerica Incorporated | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.07% | 3.13% | 4.87% | 3.74% | 2.68% | 1.26% | 1.31% | 1.98% | 1.69% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than CMA's maximum drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and CMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RF vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 7.89%, while Comerica Incorporated (CMA) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RF vs. CMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities