PortfoliosLab logo
RF vs. CMA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RF and CMA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RF vs. CMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RF:

0.54

CMA:

0.37

Sortino Ratio

RF:

1.04

CMA:

0.79

Omega Ratio

RF:

1.14

CMA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

RF:

0.57

CMA:

0.29

Martin Ratio

RF:

1.51

CMA:

1.19

Ulcer Index

RF:

12.04%

CMA:

12.08%

Daily Std Dev

RF:

30.74%

CMA:

36.60%

Max Drawdown

RF:

-92.65%

CMA:

-78.35%

Current Drawdown

RF:

-16.68%

CMA:

-32.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RF:

$20.17B

CMA:

$7.70B

EPS

RF:

$2.07

CMA:

$5.29

PE Ratio

RF:

10.84

CMA:

11.07

PEG Ratio

RF:

2.88

CMA:

3.93

PS Ratio

RF:

3.03

CMA:

2.38

PB Ratio

RF:

1.19

CMA:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

RF:

$9.40B

CMA:

$3.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RF:

$6.66B

CMA:

$3.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

RF:

$2.63B

CMA:

$458.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly higher than CMA's -4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed CMA with an annualized return of 12.27%, while CMA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.80% annualized return.


RF

YTD

-3.58%

1M

16.45%

6M

-12.30%

1Y

16.57%

5Y*

24.64%

10Y*

12.27%

CMA

YTD

-4.68%

1M

11.53%

6M

-15.15%

1Y

13.42%

5Y*

20.04%

10Y*

5.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RF vs. CMA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RF is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RF is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RF is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RF is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RF is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RF is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMA is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMA is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMA is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RF vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RF Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the CMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF and CMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RF vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than CMA's 4.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.41%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
4.88%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%1.69%

Drawdowns

RF vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than CMA's maximum drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and CMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RF vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 7.94%, while Comerica Incorporated (CMA) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RF vs. CMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
2.32B
924.00M
(RF) Total Revenue
(CMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RF vs. CMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regions Financial Corporation and Comerica Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
71.7%
100.0%
(RF) Gross Margin
(CMA) Gross Margin
RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 2.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

CMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 924.00M and revenue of 924.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 621.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

CMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 225.00M and revenue of 924.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 490.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.

CMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 172.00M and revenue of 924.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.