PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RF vs. CMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

RF vs. CMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA).

Performance

RF vs. CMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RF vs. CMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RF
Regions Financial Corporation		-2.69%21.99%27.00%-5.69%2.33%39.39%-1.61%33.35%-20.59%22.95%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated		2.00%46.73%16.74%-11.09%-20.38%61.53%-16.79%8.46%-19.18%29.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RF:

$22.99B

CMA:

$11.79B

EPS

RF:

$2.42

CMA:

$5.44

PE Ratio

RF:

10.80

CMA:

16.31

PS Ratio

RF:

2.42

CMA:

2.46

PB Ratio

RF:

1.30

CMA:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

RF:

$9.61B

CMA:

$4.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RF:

$7.17B

CMA:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

RF:

$2.81B

CMA:

$989.00M

Returns By Period

RF

1D
3.49%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
1.06%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
17.02%

CMA

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Regions Financial Corporation

Comerica Incorporated

Often compared with RF:
RF vs. CFGRF vs. MTBRF vs. CBSHRF vs. BANFRF vs. EWBCRF vs. FFINRF vs. UBSI
Often compared with CMA:
CMA vs. KRECMA vs. FITBCMA vs. BACCMA vs. RYCMA vs. KEYCMA vs. SPYCMA vs. VOO

Return for Risk

RF vs. CMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RF
RF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
CMA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RF vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RFCMADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.71

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RF vs. CMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RFCMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

—

—

Correlation

The correlation between RF and CMA is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RF vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison

RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than CMA's 2.40% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RF
Regions Financial Corporation		4.00%5.12%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated		2.40%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%

Drawdowns

RF vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RFCMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.65%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.45%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.73%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.79%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.31%

—

—

Volatility

RF vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RFCMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.83%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.81%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.63%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.02%

—

—

Financials

RF vs. CMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.41B
1.21B
(RF) Total Revenue
(CMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RF vs. CMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regions Financial Corporation and Comerica Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
79.8%
69.4%
Portfolio components
RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

CMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 836.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

CMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 219.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.

CMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.