RF vs. MTB
RF (Regions Financial Corporation) and MTB (M&T Bank Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, RF returned 17.26%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for MTB. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RF vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's 14.61% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 17.26%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.44% annualized return.
RF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.26%
MTB
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 29.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
RF vs. MTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 8.13% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 14.61% | 10.89% | 41.66% | -1.68% | -2.94% | 24.28% | -22.16% | 21.65% | -14.58% | 11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RF and MTB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 1991 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, RF and MTB have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
RF:
$24.96B
MTB:
$35.65B
RF:
$2.51
MTB:
$18.62
RF:
11.44
MTB:
12.23
RF:
2.65
MTB:
2.90
RF:
1.43
MTB:
1.27
RF:
$9.62B
MTB:
$12.36B
RF:
$7.29B
MTB:
$9.31B
RF:
$2.90B
MTB:
$3.93B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RF vs. MTB — Risk / Return Rank
RF
MTB
RF vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.58 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 3.71 | +0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RF vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than MTB's maximum drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and MTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.65% | -73.50% | -19.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.45% | -16.98% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.35% | -28.20% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -40.71% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.73% | -52.97% | -7.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -2.98% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -12.41% | -18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 7.21% | +0.54% |
Volatility
RF vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) have volatilities of 6.65% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 6.61% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 16.08% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.68% | 21.80% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.34% | 30.27% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 32.86% | +3.05% |
Dividends
RF vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than MTB's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.63% | 3.24% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.69% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Financials
RF vs. MTB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RF vs. MTB - Profitability Comparison
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.
MTB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.30B and revenue of 3.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 714.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.
MTB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 863.00M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 559.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
MTB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported a net income of 664.00M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RF and MTB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to MTB (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RF dropped -92.65% vs MTB's -73.50%.
RF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RF and MTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer