RF vs. MTB
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RF or MTB.
Correlation
The correlation between RF and MTB is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RF vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RF:
-0.13
MTB:
0.58
RF:
0.01
MTB:
1.02
RF:
1.00
MTB:
1.13
RF:
-0.12
MTB:
0.58
RF:
-0.40
MTB:
1.88
RF:
9.17%
MTB:
8.72%
RF:
28.46%
MTB:
28.35%
RF:
-92.65%
MTB:
-73.50%
RF:
-30.71%
MTB:
-28.31%
Fundamentals
RF:
$16.90B
MTB:
$25.80B
RF:
$1.93
MTB:
$14.63
RF:
9.67
MTB:
10.73
RF:
2.50
MTB:
24.23
RF:
$5.88B
MTB:
$8.07B
RF:
$6.48B
MTB:
$8.07B
RF:
$1.99B
MTB:
$1.98B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -19.82% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's -15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 10.62%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.
RF
-19.82%
-15.53%
-16.67%
-2.87%
23.24%
10.62%
MTB
-15.89%
-11.89%
-10.98%
17.16%
15.15%
5.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RF vs. MTB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RF
MTB
RF vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RF vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than MTB's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 5.31% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 3.44% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% | 2.23% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than MTB's maximum drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and MTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RF vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) at 12.38%. This indicates that RF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RF vs. MTB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities