RF vs. MTB
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB).
Performance
RF vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RF vs. MTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | -2.69% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 3.31% | 10.89% | 41.66% | -1.68% | -2.94% | 24.28% | -22.16% | 21.65% | -14.58% | 11.35% |
Fundamentals
RF:
$22.99B
MTB:
$32.36B
RF:
$2.42
MTB:
$18.08
RF:
10.80
MTB:
11.43
RF:
2.42
MTB:
2.65
RF:
1.30
MTB:
1.23
RF:
$9.61B
MTB:
$12.31B
RF:
$7.17B
MTB:
$9.19B
RF:
$2.81B
MTB:
$3.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's 3.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 17.02%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
RF
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.02%
MTB
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RF vs. MTB — Risk / Return Rank
RF
MTB
RF vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.73 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.12 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.27 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 3.24 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.73 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.32 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.29 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.40 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RF and MTB is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RF vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than MTB's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.00% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.83% | 3.24% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than MTB's maximum drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and MTB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.65% | -73.50% | -19.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.45% | -16.98% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -40.71% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.73% | -52.97% | -7.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.79% | -12.54% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -12.43% | -18.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 6.64% | +0.67% |
Volatility
RF vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) have volatilities of 6.68% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RF | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 6.73% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.83% | 16.46% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.81% | 26.27% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 30.46% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 32.85% | +3.17% |
Financials
RF vs. MTB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RF vs. MTB - Profitability Comparison
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
MTB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.35B and revenue of 3.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.
MTB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported an operating income of 971.00M and revenue of 3.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.
MTB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, M&T Bank Corporation reported a net income of 759.00M and revenue of 3.33B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.