RF vs. MTB
Compare and contrast key facts about Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RF or MTB.
Performance
RF vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RF achieves a 40.53% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's 60.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RF has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 13.87%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.52% annualized return.
RF
40.53%
10.24%
35.15%
69.46%
14.38%
13.87%
MTB
60.04%
8.18%
41.70%
74.60%
9.17%
8.52%
Fundamentals
| RF | MTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.79B | $35.38B |
| EPS | $1.77 | $13.52 |
| PE Ratio | 14.79 | 15.77 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.84 | 1.37 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $8.07B | $12.37B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $8.09B | $12.37B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.45B | $1.59B |
Key characteristics
| RF | MTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.41 | 2.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.43 | 3.65 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.08 | 2.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.19 | 18.13 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.18% | 4.13% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.34% | 28.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.65% | -73.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.38% | -1.32% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between RF and MTB is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RF vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RF vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
RF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than MTB's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.69% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 1.01% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.48% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% | 2.23% | 2.41% |
Drawdowns
RF vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RF drawdown since its inception was -92.65%, which is greater than MTB's maximum drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF and MTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RF vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is 12.20%, while M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that RF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RF vs. MTB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regions Financial Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities