TRFK vs. GXPT
TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TRFK tracks the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
TRFK vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 53.11% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 18.92% return.
TRFK
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 48.83%
- YTD
- 53.11%
- 1Y
- 65.34%
- 3Y*
- 45.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 18.69%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRFK vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 53.11% | 5.93% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 18.92% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFK and GXPT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFK vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
TRFK
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRFK vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRFK | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRFK vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFK | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -18.74% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -7.11% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -5.24% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | — | — |
Volatility
TRFK vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFK | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.39% | 22.96% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 22.96% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 22.96% | +7.41% |
TRFK vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFK vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than GXPT's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFK and GXPT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.
TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for TRFK and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer