PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRFK vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRFK vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 39.17% return, which is significantly higher than DTCR's 30.53% return.


TRFK

1D
0.48%
1M
-7.73%
6M
37.75%
YTD
39.17%
1Y
47.45%
3Y*
39.62%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.56%

DTCR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.58%
6M
12.55%
YTD
30.53%
1Y
47.91%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.41M$38.68M$44.72M
$17.52M$18.57M$19.27M

TRFK vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
39.17%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
30.53%28.99%14.92%18.93%-18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and DTCR is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.67

The correlation between TRFK and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRFK vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRFK vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRFKDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.55

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

8.11

-3.56

TRFK vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRFKDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-38.98%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.17%

-17.88%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.06%

-24.96%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.81%

-15.15%

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-12.26%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.64%

5.62%

+4.02%

Volatility

TRFK vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 17.07% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 8.80%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRFKDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.07%

8.80%

+8.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.10%

19.77%

+12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.82%

24.75%

+12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.90%

22.50%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.90%

22.25%

+8.65%

TRFK vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRFK vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than DTCR's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.90%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRFK and DTCR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to DTCR (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 39.62% vs 27.27% for DTCR. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 39.62% return vs 27.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while DTCR is REIT. TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRFK and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer