PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPYP vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 22.99% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 14.00% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 11.58%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.23% annualized return.


TPYP

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.79%
6M
24.31%
YTD
22.99%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*
11.58%

ONEQ

1D
0.29%
1M
1.75%
6M
11.92%
YTD
14.00%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
19.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
22.99%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
14.00%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TPYP and ONEQ is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.36

The correlation between TPYP and ONEQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPYP
ONEQ

Energy

68.7%
0.5%

Utilities

22.0%
0.8%

Financial Services

2.4%
2.9%

Industrials

0.1%
2.9%

Basic Materials

0.1%
0.9%

Communication Services

-

15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

4.7%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

54.3%

Energy

TPYP
68.7%
ONEQ
0.5%

Utilities

TPYP
22.0%
ONEQ
0.8%

Financial Services

TPYP
2.4%
ONEQ
2.9%

Industrials

TPYP
0.1%
ONEQ
2.9%

Basic Materials

TPYP
0.1%
ONEQ
0.9%

Communication Services

TPYP

-

ONEQ
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TPYP

-

ONEQ
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

TPYP

-

ONEQ
4.4%

Healthcare

TPYP

-

ONEQ
4.7%

Real Estate

TPYP

-

ONEQ
0.6%

Technology

TPYP

-

ONEQ
54.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPYP vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPYPONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.28

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

8.31

+1.22

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPYP Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPYP and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPYPONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-55.09%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-12.64%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-24.09%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-35.23%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

-35.23%

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-2.69%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-7.94%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.46%

-0.61%

Volatility

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is 5.25%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that TPYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPYPONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

6.91%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

14.01%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

17.58%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

22.39%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

21.77%

+0.13%

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPYP vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than ONEQ's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.85%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.21%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPYP and ONEQ have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to TPYP (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.23% vs 11.58% for TPYP. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.23% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.85% for ONEQ.

TPYP is categorized as Energy Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.21% for ONEQ.

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPYP and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer