TOS vs. FNDB
TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Twin Oak ETF Company, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. TOS is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
TOS vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOS
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
TOS vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 14.23% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOS and FNDB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOS vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
TOS
FNDB
TOS vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 0.78 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
TOS vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -38.17% | +26.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -1.61% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -3.66% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
TOS vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 10.86% | +15.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 15.38% | +11.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 17.48% | +8.93% |
TOS vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOS vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOS and FNDB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TOS.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.
TOS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.25% for FNDB.
Find the right allocation for TOS and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer