PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOS vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOS vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TOS

1D
-4.55%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.48%
YTD
3.65%
6M
4.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOS vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOS and BUFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOS vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOS vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOSBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

2.51

-0.77

Drawdowns

TOS vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOSBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-2.87%

-8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-0.59%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-0.24%

-2.33%

Volatility

TOS vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOSBUFXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.41%

4.02%

+22.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.41%

4.02%

+22.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.41%

4.02%

+22.39%

TOS vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOS vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TOS nor BUFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TOS and BUFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOS is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOS is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

TOS and BUFX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TOS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOS and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer