TOS vs. RSSY
TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOS charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.
Performance
TOS vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSY
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 36.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOS vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 18.66% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOS and RSSY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOS vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank
TOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSSY
TOS vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOS | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOS vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and RSSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOS | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -29.57% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -4.08% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -7.19% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility
TOS vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOS | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.53% | 13.52% | +13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 18.22% | +8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 18.22% | +8.31% |
TOS vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOS vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison
TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 1.59% | 2.04% |
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOS and RSSY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOS is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOS is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 1.04% for RSSY.
Find the right allocation for TOS and RSSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer