PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNGX vs. IMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TNGX vs. IMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNGX achieves a 249.21% return, which is significantly higher than IMO's 41.99% return.


TNGX

1D
3.76%
1M
21.29%
YTD
249.21%
6M
230.91%
1Y
512.67%
3Y*
104.27%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*

IMO

1D
0.26%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
41.99%
6M
33.35%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
37.72%
5Y*
32.35%
10Y*
17.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNGX vs. IMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
249.21%186.73%-68.79%36.55%-33.73%-4.37%15.79%
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
41.99%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TNGX and IMO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TNGX:

$4.44B

IMO:

$58.80B

EPS

TNGX:

-$0.89

IMO:

$5.87

PS Ratio

TNGX:

65.32

IMO:

1.30

PB Ratio

TNGX:

11.35

IMO:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

TNGX:

$56.99M

IMO:

$46.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TNGX:

$55.33M

IMO:

$7.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

TNGX:

-$111.92M

IMO:

$6.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNGX vs. IMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNGX
TNGX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNGX vs. IMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNGXIMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.33

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.69

3.47

+14.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.00

10.04

+35.96

TNGX vs. IMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNGX Sharpe Ratio is 5.18, which is higher than the IMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNGX and IMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNGX vs. IMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNGX drawdown since its inception was -93.64%, which is greater than IMO's maximum drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNGX and IMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNGXIMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.64%

-84.82%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-16.51%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.46%

-22.95%

-68.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.64%

-29.72%

-63.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-11.88%

+9.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-21.19%

-26.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.24%

5.69%

+5.55%

Volatility

TNGX vs. IMO - Volatility Comparison

Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) has a higher volatility of 52.40% compared to Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) at 9.97%. This indicates that TNGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNGXIMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

52.40%

9.97%

+42.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.75%

22.21%

+55.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.90%

27.31%

+72.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.94%

32.66%

+69.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.02%

35.55%

+60.47%

Dividends

TNGX vs. IMO - Dividend Comparison

TNGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
1.90%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TNGX vs. IMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tango Therapeutics, Inc. and Imperial Oil Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202220232024202520260
12.45B
(TNGX) Total Revenue
(IMO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TNGX and IMO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGX has higher volatility (52.40%) compared to IMO (9.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNGX dropped -93.64% vs IMO's -84.82%.

TNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNGX and IMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer