TNGX vs. IMO
TNGX (Tango Therapeutics, Inc.) and IMO (Imperial Oil Limited) are both stocks. TNGX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while IMO operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 5 years, TNGX returned 22.99%/yr vs 32.35%/yr for IMO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TNGX vs. IMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNGX achieves a 249.21% return, which is significantly higher than IMO's 41.99% return.
TNGX
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- 21.29%
- YTD
- 249.21%
- 6M
- 230.91%
- 1Y
- 512.67%
- 3Y*
- 104.27%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- —
IMO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- 41.99%
- 6M
- 33.35%
- 1Y
- 56.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- 32.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.61%
TNGX vs. IMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNGX Tango Therapeutics, Inc. | 249.21% | 186.73% | -68.79% | 36.55% | -33.73% | -4.37% | 15.79% |
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 41.99% | 43.85% | 10.47% | 20.89% | 38.00% | 95.29% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNGX and IMO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
TNGX:
$4.44B
IMO:
$58.80B
TNGX:
-$0.89
IMO:
$5.87
TNGX:
65.32
IMO:
1.30
TNGX:
11.35
IMO:
2.58
TNGX:
$56.99M
IMO:
$46.55B
TNGX:
$55.33M
IMO:
$7.69B
TNGX:
-$111.92M
IMO:
$6.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNGX vs. IMO — Risk / Return Rank
TNGX
IMO
TNGX vs. IMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNGX | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.33 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.69 | 3.47 | +14.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.00 | 10.04 | +35.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNGX vs. IMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNGX drawdown since its inception was -93.64%, which is greater than IMO's maximum drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNGX and IMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNGX | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.64% | -84.82% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -16.51% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.46% | -22.95% | -68.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.64% | -29.72% | -63.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -11.88% | +9.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.98% | -21.19% | -26.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.24% | 5.69% | +5.55% |
Volatility
TNGX vs. IMO - Volatility Comparison
Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) has a higher volatility of 52.40% compared to Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) at 9.97%. This indicates that TNGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNGX | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.40% | 9.97% | +42.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.75% | 22.21% | +55.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.90% | 27.31% | +72.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.94% | 32.66% | +69.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.02% | 35.55% | +60.47% |
Dividends
TNGX vs. IMO - Dividend Comparison
TNGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 1.90% | 2.40% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 2.30% | 2.28% | 3.50% | 2.41% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.66% |
TNGX Tango Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TNGX vs. IMO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tango Therapeutics, Inc. and Imperial Oil Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TNGX and IMO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNGX has higher volatility (52.40%) compared to IMO (9.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNGX dropped -93.64% vs IMO's -84.82%.
TNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNGX and IMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer