TNA vs. FN

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300%), while FN (Fabrinet) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TNA returned 8.78%/yr vs 32.67%/yr for FN. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TNA vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 53.14% return, which is significantly higher than FN's 34.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 8.78%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 32.67% annualized return.

TNA

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 53.14%
• 6M: 40.13%
• 1Y: 130.01%
• 3Y*: 25.74%
• 5Y*: -6.50%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

FN

• 1D: 4.94%
• 1M: -15.38%
• YTD: 34.21%
• 6M: 29.76%
• 1Y: 149.30%
• 3Y*: 67.62%
• 5Y*: 45.38%
• 10Y*: 32.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNA vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	53.14%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%
FN Fabrinet	34.21%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and FN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010	0.53

The correlation between TNA and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TNA vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 68
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 89
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNA vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TNA	FN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.07	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.41	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	6.22	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.92	15.46	-3.54

TNA vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FN Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TNA vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and FN.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNA	FN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.09%	-70.46%	-17.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.53%	-22.27%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.78%	-37.47%	-28.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.36%	-38.70%	-43.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.09%	-51.11%	-36.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.23%	-18.15%	-17.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.92%	-22.58%	-11.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.91%	8.95%	+0.96%

Volatility

TNA vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) is 21.54%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 24.63%. This indicates that TNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNA	FN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.54%	24.63%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.61%	56.18%	-13.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.70%	67.07%	-8.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.57%	53.67%	+13.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.54%	48.29%	+20.25%

Dividends

TNA vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FN Fabrinet	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.39%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNA and FN in my portfolio?

TNA and FN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNA or FN?

FN has higher volatility (24.63%) compared to TNA (21.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs FN's -70.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.