TMVE vs. FVD
TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) and FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TMVE tracks the Actively Managed while FVD tracks the Value Line Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMVE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FVD.
Performance
TMVE vs. FVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMVE achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return.
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FVD
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
TMVE vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 14.73% | 6.04% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.21% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMVE and FVD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMVE vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank
TMVE
FVD
TMVE vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMVE | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.18 | 0.58 | +2.60 |
Drawdowns
TMVE vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMVE drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMVE and FVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMVE | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -51.00% | +42.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -5.96% | +5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -5.44% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
TMVE vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMVE | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 9.50% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 12.76% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 15.44% | -1.50% |
TMVE vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMVE vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison
TMVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FVD's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.31% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMVE and FVD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
TMVE tracks Actively Managed, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMVE and 0.61% for FVD.
Find the right allocation for TMVE and FVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer