TMVE vs. ABLD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) and ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TMVE tracks the Actively Managed while ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMVE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLD.

Performance

TMVE vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMVE achieves a 17.76% return, which is significantly higher than ABLD's 5.59% return.

TMVE

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.58%
• YTD: 17.76%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABLD

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 11.17%
• 3Y*: 11.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMVE vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	17.76%	6.04%
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	5.59%	0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TMVE and ABLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

TMVE vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMVE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 21
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMVE vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMVE	ABLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.09	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.86	—

Drawdowns

TMVE vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMVE drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, smaller than the maximum ABLD drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMVE and ABLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMVE	ABLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-19.35%	+11.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-9.88%	+9.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-4.01%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMVE	ABLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.84%	15.08%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.84%	17.51%	-3.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	17.51%	-3.67%

TMVE vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLD's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMVE vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

TMVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than ABLD's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.32%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	0.10%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMVE and ABLD in my portfolio?

TMVE and ABLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMVE or ABLD?

On fees, ABLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMVE or ABLD?

ABLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMVE or ABLD?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.

What is the main difference between TMVE and ABLD?

TMVE tracks Actively Managed, while ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMVE and 0.39% for ABLD.