TMV vs. SPUU
TMV (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMV is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while SPUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMV returned -0.80%/yr vs 24.77%/yr for SPUU. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMV charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
TMV vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMV achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TMV has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of -0.80%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.77% annualized return.
TMV
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.12%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 53.61%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
TMV vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMV Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X | 4.73% | -3.75% | 39.76% | -9.69% | 150.18% | 0.83% | -54.13% | -34.22% | 3.99% | -26.48% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 19.82% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 61.27% | 21.85% | 66.84% | -14.59% | 44.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMV and SPUU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.14 |
The correlation between TMV and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMV vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
TMV
SPUU
TMV vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMV | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.38 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.96 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 13.06 | -13.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMV | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 2.26 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.61 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.69 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 0.63 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
TMV vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMV drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMV and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMV | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -59.35% | -39.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.62% | -18.19% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.49% | -35.18% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.49% | -46.59% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.31% | -59.35% | -22.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.94% | -1.27% | -94.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.60% | -9.51% | -77.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.13% | 4.12% | +7.01% |
Volatility
TMV vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that TMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMV | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 5.71% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 18.09% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.12% | 23.90% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.21% | 33.46% | +13.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.44% | 35.77% | +8.67% |
TMV vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMV has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMV vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
TMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
TMV Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X | 2.62% | 2.85% | 3.41% | 3.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.60% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMV and SPUU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMV has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMV dropped -98.96% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.77% vs -0.80% for TMV. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.77% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for TMV.
TMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.
TMV is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while SPUU is Leveraged Equities. TMV tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.04% for TMV and 0.64% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMV and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer