TMSIX vs. TMAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX).
TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993. TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -4.21% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX has outperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
TMAAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSIX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
TMSIX
TMAAX
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSIX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.94 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.40 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.21 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.16 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 5.41 | -4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSIX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.94 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.53 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSIX and TMAAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.70%, more than TMAAX's 7.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.61% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than TMAAX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and TMAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSIX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -50.54% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -9.88% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.57% | -26.55% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -26.99% | -13.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -7.55% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -7.41% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.12% | +1.17% |
Volatility
TMSIX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) at 4.06%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSIX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 4.06% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 7.66% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 13.98% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 13.81% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 13.28% | +7.12% |