PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAAX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


TMAAX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.70%
6M
9.46%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
9.80%

FXAIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
8.70%15.13%19.29%17.06%-17.79%15.74%14.13%21.47%-6.30%11.50%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
11.56%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAAX and FXAIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.96

The correlation between TMAAX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMAAX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAAX
TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMAAXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.55

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

3.46

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.39

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.45

15.86

-2.41

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAAX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMAAXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.55

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.84

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.87

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.82

-0.36

Drawdowns

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMAAXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-33.79%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-8.89%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.37%

-18.76%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-24.50%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.99%

-33.79%

+6.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-3.79%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.90%

-0.21%

Volatility

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) have volatilities of 2.75% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMAAXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.82%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

8.99%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

11.88%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

16.91%

-3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

18.07%

-4.75%

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMAAX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than FXAIX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
6.70%7.29%11.82%3.55%3.03%6.94%4.16%6.27%6.01%1.10%0.99%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TMAAX and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXAIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to TMAAX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAAX dropped -50.54% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMAAX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer