TMAAX vs. TSCSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX).
TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005. TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996.
Performance
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -4.21% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -3.28% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than TSCSX's -3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX has underperformed TSCSX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while TSCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.
TMAAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
TSCSX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCSX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMAAX vs. TSCSX — Risk / Return Rank
TMAAX
TSCSX
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAAX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.46 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 0.81 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.56 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 2.01 | +3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAAX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.46 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.19 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.52 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.39 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAAX and TSCSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Dividend Comparison
TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than TSCSX's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.61% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.44% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
Drawdowns
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum TSCSX drawdown of -56.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and TSCSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAAX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -56.66% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -14.31% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -27.04% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.99% | -41.63% | +14.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -11.36% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -10.29% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.96% | -1.84% |
Volatility
TMAAX vs. TSCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) is 4.06%, while Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that TMAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMAAX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 6.31% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 12.48% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 22.16% | -8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 21.65% | -7.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 22.08% | -8.80% |